cheaper trading and ad-exchanges

3 Aug 2011. No Comments.  Tags: , , , , . - Posted by Josh Borthwick

A bit of crystal ball speculation and debate took place on OMD NZ’s blog a while back about advertising exchanges. Ad-exchanges provide a platform for advertisers, networks and publishers to buy and sell their inventory via real-time bidding through technology. In taking the ‘human’ portion (largely price negotiation and customisation) out of the equation greater efficiencies (mainly cost savings on paper) are achieved.

I think exchanges will have their place just as performance networks have before them. I seriously doubt they will have the ability to increase CPMs for publishers, so the old conundrum of cost / benefit still raises it’s head for any publishers wanting to fund their sites via advertising. As for additional (pay-wall, T-Shirts, Mugs, Ipads & Android apps?) funding options – they haven’t yet proven themselves a viable proposition for many publishers or users for that matter.

In the interests of full disclosure, we don’t sell cost per click advertising and don’t farm impressions out to third party networks. We specialise in delivering targeted audiences and placements for our advertisers on behalf of our publishers. We do also sell Behavioural Targeting in conjunction with contextual targeting. I don’t see us or our publishers tipping inventory into exchanges unless they can seriously improve our effective CPM across individual sites. Does it cost us more to send real people out to agencies and advertisers as apposed to Google or Microsoft’s (assuming they own or buy the biggest exchange platforms in market) cut? I actually doubt it. Especially coupled with the other selling opportunities those people have beyond standard broad-reach banner campaigns.

Read the rest of this article.

Movie-goers are ONLINE

13 May 2011. No Comments.  . - Posted by AdHub Admin

The people have spoken and the results of New Zealand’s first ever ‘Cinema Census’ have been collated.

Nearly 4,000 Kiwis responded to the online survey. Fittingly, a 50/50 male-female split responded. All age groups are represented, with a majority (34%) in the 26-35 year-old bracket.

Key findings showing the strong online cinema presence follow;

*84% of movie-goers go online for movie times, 11% look in the newspaper and 5% mobile or other device.

*21% buy movie tickets online.

*89% go online for movie information (e.g. reviews and synopsis), followed by the newspaper on 6%.

*Of all ‘movie’ advertising the respondents saw most (47%) ads online, followed by 28% on TV. This is not represented in ad spend of movie distributors in 2011 with 70% of spend going on TV and only 2.4% online (Nielsen Ad Quest Expenditure, 2011) . It does however show the effectiveness of online!

For the full survey results check it out on Flicks.co.nz here.

The clickers…

27 Apr 2011. 2 Comments.  Tags: , , , , , . - Posted by Josh Borthwick

With more and more research suggesting that clicks are at best meaningless and worse misleading, why is it still our single biggest measure of success for online banner advertising? A recent article by Mediapost hilights research that shows multiple clicks within the same browser session and higher click-thrus from lower income / older, less tech-savvy users.

So here’s what your high-volume clicker looks like based on these research findings:

Read the rest of this article.